
During a recent episode of
Next Iron Chef America Michael Ruhlman, serving as one of the judges, criticized one of the chefs for serving a consommé that wasn't perfectly clear. "Technically, consommé is a clear soup or broth," according to Ruhlman and in this case the liquid showed the red coloration of the watermelon it was made from. Picky? Yes. Technically correct? Yes. Important? Not in my view.
You can read the complete article at Spot-on.
Labels: book, review, spot-on
13 Comments:
Kevin, I thought you didn't buy cookbooks. So why should anyone go out and buy this one?
Ed,
What I said was I seldom buy cookbooks, but this isn't a cookbook, it's a reference book and I still buy them (although this one was sent as a review copy). It has faults, but it's not without value. I would even argue it's worth buying just for the 50 pages of essays -- whether you have veal bones available or not.
Ed,
BTW, I love it when you confront me. You do so in such a way that I have to go back and re-examine my statements for inconsistencies, inaccuracies, or thoughtless opinion. And almost always decide I was correct, consistent, or right. Sometimes all three. You give great negative affirmation.
Slut.
~grinning
Boys, boys!
Anyway.
Technically, Ruhlman was wrong if he thought a watermelon "consomme" shouldn't have any coloration. Pinkish water is fine. What it shouldn't have is any particulate matter, any cloudiness.
I mean, the beef consomme from a pot au feu is gloriously goldy-brown. And it's clear. (Which doesn't mean colorless.)
Now I will go over and read the rest of your essay.
CC,
Then I may have misremembered the episode. I thought he objected to the color, but that may not have been the case. Nevertheless, he was still overly fussy in my opinion. Reminds me of Ed.
Kevin, I just finished reading the book last week. I was similarly dismayed at Ruhlman's slant toward French cuisine. I did learn from the book, though, and will likely refer to it as I do Julia's books on occasion too.
Donna,
I'm sure I'll use the book, I do enough writing to welcome yet another reference. And I would have bought the book just because I like reading Ruhlman. But if it weren't for that I wouldn't find it particularly useful given the books I already own.
I don't accuse you of missremembering the segment. And I didn't see it, so I've got nothing.
But *IF* he thinks consommes can't have color, he's wrong.
When you make tomato water, you stop as soon as the red starts dripping into the amber-colored serum. Because it's particulate and will be cloudy.
I don't know if watermelon "water" is colorless or pink. Maybe he objected to the cloudy stuff getting in. And he would be right.
CC,
But does it matter? In England a biscuit is a cookie, not a soft chemically-risen bread.
This post has been removed by the author.
Kevin, it's funny how you so often seem to echo the sentiments of my wife. Were we married in a previous life?
Always happy to affirm you, negatively speaking.
Hi Kevin,
Nice review. My thoughts too. Though when I first hit the veal stock section I threw the book down and gave up. "What is he thinking? As if anyone can get veal bones!" Picked it up again a week later to finish. I like Michael's writing and I learn from him, but I do think he is too heavily slanted to French cuisine and not particularly practical for the home cook. That said I recommended it as well, just because if you really want to take your cooking to another level, this book has some great tips.
Elise,
It'll be a handy volume to have around -- at least it ways less than my Larousse Grastonomique.{g}
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home