A New Eye
A New Eye

Back in 2001 I bought my second camera, a Canon Powershot A20. I'm by no means a photographer and it was a great little camera, easy to use — although I didn't use it very often, as I said, I'm not a photographer. (Note: Only the first and last photos were taken with the Nikon. The rest simply illustrate how bad I was.)

Then in 2005 I decided that food blogs with photos were far superior to food blogs without so I decided that every article I posted here would have an accompanying photo. It was a struggle. I took some appallingly bad shots that probably did more to turn appetites off than on. But I stuck with it and got some excellent advice from several people, most notably my brother Kerry.
I also started really paying attention to other food photos and learning from them. I worked on setting the shot up, learned to do lighting, learned the camera's strengths and weaknesses, invested in a tripod, built a light box, and took lots and lots of pictures — as many as 50 a week for the next two years. And my photography inexorably improved. Until last summer. Last summer my images started drifting downhill.

At first I thought it was my imagination. That I had simply become more self-critical, and there was certainly an element of that. Or that I simply wasn't taking the care and making the effort I had before, but that wasn't it. I didn't think it was the camera. As we used to say in my programming days, bits don't rot. A digital camera's quality shouldn't deteriorate. It should either work perfectly or not. Period. But I finely came to the conclusion that the camera was deteriorating… and then, this past January, I realized that although the imaging was digital, the auto-focus mechanism was an analog servo-motor and it was wearing out. Doh!

By this time I was actually making money off of my photos. Directly in the case of articles for NPR and a few print publications, and indirectly in the case of Gather.com, Spot-on.com, and now About.com. I could certainly justify a new camera and it was clearly time to upgrade to a digital SLR.
I needed more control over depth of field to get those cool shots where the background fades away. I needed more control over focal point, I needed more control over white balance, in fact I needed more control over everything.
I did my research and settled on the Nikon D40. Again, I'm not a photographer, but the camera had quite a few positive reviews and Consumer Reports listed it as a Best Buy. It was also within my budget and my second choice (a Canon EOS) wasn't, so at the end of January I took the plunge and bought a refurbished D40 ($440).

Two months later I'm pleased as punch. The last time I was this happy with a purchase was when I bought my Toyota Camry — and that cost over $20k. Like it's predecessor, the Canon, it feels right in my hands. As a cook, and so someone who works with his hands, that tactile sense of confidence is important, reassuring, even though I rely on a tripod 99 percent of the time.
It's also relatively simple to use. If I wished I could treat it just like a point-and-shoot. But I've found that I can add in more sophisticated capabilities as I become ready to tackle them. Right off the bat I started using the ability to actually set the focus. This was something I'd long dreamed of and now I had the option. At first I just specified the kind of lighting I was using — fluorescent, daylight, incandescent — which determines the white balance in a photo. But now I'm directly setting the white balance.
The photos for About.com are proving to be a challenge because the maximum photo size in an article there is 200 x 200 pixels. I can provide larger photos but can't directly include them. So what I'm trying to do now is go in for really tight shots that offer enough detail at 200px and then pull back for a larger photo that works at 500px.
It's not all good. I knew my lighting system was weak, but that's even more apparent with this camera because it can pick up nuances the Canon couldn't. I like to set a delay on shots so I can take my hands off the camera before shooting (my current setup requires that I bend over, hunch down, and twist to shoot so keeping rock-steady even with a tripod is a problem), this camera requires I reset the delay for each shot. Fortunately it has a couple of macro buttons and I programmed one to set the delay so I don't have to go into the menus each time.
The menus could be better organized, it took me a while to figure out where to go for what, and the manual, as usual, is piss-poor. On the other hand the battery life is amazing, in two months I've only had to charge it three times while the Canon needed charging after every couple of sessions.
All in all, I couldn't be happier. And sometimes, when I pick the camera up from my desk to take back to my studio/guest room I note a smile flickering across my mouth as my hand closes around the device and I lift it. If you’re a cook, don't undervalue the feel of a camera, it matters as much as your favorite knife.
Back in 2001 I bought my second camera, a Canon Powershot A20. I'm by no means a photographer and it was a great little camera, easy to use — although I didn't use it very often, as I said, I'm not a photographer. (Note: Only the first and last photos were taken with the Nikon. The rest simply illustrate how bad I was.)

Then in 2005 I decided that food blogs with photos were far superior to food blogs without so I decided that every article I posted here would have an accompanying photo. It was a struggle. I took some appallingly bad shots that probably did more to turn appetites off than on. But I stuck with it and got some excellent advice from several people, most notably my brother Kerry.
I also started really paying attention to other food photos and learning from them. I worked on setting the shot up, learned to do lighting, learned the camera's strengths and weaknesses, invested in a tripod, built a light box, and took lots and lots of pictures — as many as 50 a week for the next two years. And my photography inexorably improved. Until last summer. Last summer my images started drifting downhill.

At first I thought it was my imagination. That I had simply become more self-critical, and there was certainly an element of that. Or that I simply wasn't taking the care and making the effort I had before, but that wasn't it. I didn't think it was the camera. As we used to say in my programming days, bits don't rot. A digital camera's quality shouldn't deteriorate. It should either work perfectly or not. Period. But I finely came to the conclusion that the camera was deteriorating… and then, this past January, I realized that although the imaging was digital, the auto-focus mechanism was an analog servo-motor and it was wearing out. Doh!

By this time I was actually making money off of my photos. Directly in the case of articles for NPR and a few print publications, and indirectly in the case of Gather.com, Spot-on.com, and now About.com. I could certainly justify a new camera and it was clearly time to upgrade to a digital SLR.
I needed more control over depth of field to get those cool shots where the background fades away. I needed more control over focal point, I needed more control over white balance, in fact I needed more control over everything.
I did my research and settled on the Nikon D40. Again, I'm not a photographer, but the camera had quite a few positive reviews and Consumer Reports listed it as a Best Buy. It was also within my budget and my second choice (a Canon EOS) wasn't, so at the end of January I took the plunge and bought a refurbished D40 ($440).
Two months later I'm pleased as punch. The last time I was this happy with a purchase was when I bought my Toyota Camry — and that cost over $20k. Like it's predecessor, the Canon, it feels right in my hands. As a cook, and so someone who works with his hands, that tactile sense of confidence is important, reassuring, even though I rely on a tripod 99 percent of the time.
It's also relatively simple to use. If I wished I could treat it just like a point-and-shoot. But I've found that I can add in more sophisticated capabilities as I become ready to tackle them. Right off the bat I started using the ability to actually set the focus. This was something I'd long dreamed of and now I had the option. At first I just specified the kind of lighting I was using — fluorescent, daylight, incandescent — which determines the white balance in a photo. But now I'm directly setting the white balance.
The photos for About.com are proving to be a challenge because the maximum photo size in an article there is 200 x 200 pixels. I can provide larger photos but can't directly include them. So what I'm trying to do now is go in for really tight shots that offer enough detail at 200px and then pull back for a larger photo that works at 500px.
The menus could be better organized, it took me a while to figure out where to go for what, and the manual, as usual, is piss-poor. On the other hand the battery life is amazing, in two months I've only had to charge it three times while the Canon needed charging after every couple of sessions.
All in all, I couldn't be happier. And sometimes, when I pick the camera up from my desk to take back to my studio/guest room I note a smile flickering across my mouth as my hand closes around the device and I lift it. If you’re a cook, don't undervalue the feel of a camera, it matters as much as your favorite knife.







15 Comments:
Congratulations. Nice work, Kev!
Kevin, I'm thoroughly enjoying your newfound talent and skill with the camera. I wish I could spend some time with you pickin' up what you've already learned. I keep working at it and I'm thinking it's time for a class.
I liked the way you wrote about it too.
I have the earlier iteration of this Nikon, and I'm pretty happy with that, too. Upgrading from a point-and-shoot to the DSLR really made a difference.
CC,
Thanks.
Donna,
I've got an article I'll send you.
Lydia,
I'm surprised at what a difference it's made.
Congratulations!!! You have been nominated for a 2007 Best Of Blog Award!! Especially designed to bring attention to lower profile bloggers, The BoB’s as we like to call them are currently taking nominations in over 20 different categories. To find out more about how your site has a chance to become one of this year’s Best Of’s and how to nominate other bloggers, visit us at www.thebestofblogs.com. Remember voting begins April 14th so make sure you pass the word to your friends, family, and faithful followers.
Sincerely,
Bill Beck
Project Mgr.
www.TheBestOfBlogs.com
Email:Bloggerbeck@aol.com
My favorite part was being able to put the camera to my face and look through the viewfinder again. I hated snapping pictures with my arms extended with the camera way out there. Cheers!
Biggles
Rev,
That is nice, but I have to fold myslef in half to do it (with my current setup) which isn't nice.
Kevin!
Thank you so much, as perhaps you've just explained why my digital camera, which once worked fine, now refuses to take pictures in focus! I was thinking -- man, my hands can't be *that* jittery... Sigh...
Emily
Emily,
That's exactly the problem I was having.
I still look at photos on other blogs with such longing, with something almost approaching lust. I practically will my photos, taken with my measly digital camera, to be that good. As a student I'm just not able to convince myself that the investment is something that's totally justified right now, and I have piss-poor photography skills, so I'm not quite there yet. I'm so glad that your new camera's working out for you, it sure looks like it is! Maybe some day soon...
Shelby,
The solution is easy. Go find yourself a really good 35mm camera & a few lenses. I found a once 2500 dollar, Nikon F4s, camera for 199 dollars. Then look for an old manual focus 50mm f1.4 lens for a few dollars and have your film processed, then scanned to CD.
You'll outperform my D200 with EASE. Plus you can buy a shoe-mount flash for probably 50 bux and you'll be set for life.
Kevin,
What lens you got? That you need to fold yerself in half fer?
Biggles
Shelby,
I know exactly what you mean. And I'd still be using my old camera except that now I'm making enough off my food writing (and required photos) to justify the cost.
Rev,
I've got a light box sitting on a card table and to get those nice straight on shots I have to bend over to table height to see what I'm shooting.
Gotcha. Yeah, I have a makeshift studio at work I use probably twice a year and I got it up at about 5'. Makes taking pictures of cans & rotted wood that much easier.
Biggles
Hi, Kevin,
Congratulations on your new camera. You may remember I've got the D70, and have found it a joy.
Rather than using the self-timer, you might want to invest in an infrared remote control. You can get no-name ones on ebay really cheaply. They don't have the range of the Nikon ML-L3, but you don't really need that--just a way to trip the shutter after the camera shake has gone away. Take a look and you can pick one up for $6 or $7, including shipping.
George,
Thanks for the tip and link.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home